t<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Tech Insight: Facebook is for Sharing, Not Storing	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://gjertsen.ca/tech-insight-facebook-is-for-sharing-not-storing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://gjertsen.ca/tech-insight-facebook-is-for-sharing-not-storing/</link>
	<description>Yep - Just another blog...and the &#039;G&#039; is silent.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2019 13:02:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Tech Insight: To Backup or To Archive? That Is The Question... - Gjertsen [dot] ca		</title>
		<link>https://gjertsen.ca/tech-insight-facebook-is-for-sharing-not-storing/#comment-3</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tech Insight: To Backup or To Archive? That Is The Question... - Gjertsen [dot] ca]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2019 13:02:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://gjertsen.ca/?p=2827#comment-3</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] not a bad idea to have several backups. In a previous post (Tech Insight: Facebook is for Sharing, Not Storing), I mentioned a &#8216;3-2-1&#8217; backup strategy. With this method, you have 3 copies of your [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] not a bad idea to have several backups. In a previous post (Tech Insight: Facebook is for Sharing, Not Storing), I mentioned a &#8216;3-2-1&#8217; backup strategy. With this method, you have 3 copies of your [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>